Restricted purchase of regulated items over a network

ABSTRACT

A technique is disclosed for implementing electronic commerce transactions via a data network. A regulated item selected by a customer is identified. The regulated item may correspond to an item which satisfies predetermined criteria, indicating that the regulated item is prohibited from being purchased by the customer. Action is then taken to prohibit the purchase of the selected item, via the data network, by the customer. According to one embodiment, the action taken to prohibit the purchase of the regulated item is automatically implemented at a server system configured to implement electronic commerce transactions between an on-line merchant and the customer. According to a specific implementation, the predetermined criteria correspond to regulations which restrict sales of the regulated items to persons in a particular jurisdiction based upon certain criteria such as, for example, time of day, day of week, age of the customer, type of product being sold, etc.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.11/701,206, filed Feb. 1, 2007, and entitled “RESTRICTED PURCHASE OFREGULATED ITEMS OVER A NETWORK” (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,010,411 B2), whichis hereby incorporated herein by reference, and which in turn is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/813,235, filed Mar.19, 2001, and entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR HANDLING SALES OF REGULATED ITEMSOVER A DATA NETWORK” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,308,423), which is herebyincorporated herein by reference.

This application is also related to the following patent applications:U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/568,603, filed May 10, 2000, andentitled “INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR ORDERING, FULFILLMENT, AND DELIVERY OFCONSUMER PRODUCTS USING A DATA NETWORK” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,825);and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/750,385, filed Dec. 27, 2000,and entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR IMPLEMENTING ITEM SUBSTITUTION FORUNAVAILABLE ITEMS RELATING TO A CUSTOMER ORDER (now U.S. Pat. No.7,233,914)”. Each of the above-referenced U.S. Patent Applications isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to electronic commerce, and morespecifically to a technique for handling on-line sales and delivery ofregulated items implemented using a data network.

2. Background

Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in on-lineelectronic commerce transactions conducted between consumers andretailers via the Internet or World Wide Web. Typically, during anelectronic commerce transaction, the on-line merchant or retailerdisplays an electronic catalog of items which are available for purchaseby a consumer or customer. The consumer then selects desired items toadd to his or her electronic shopping cart and, when finished, requeststo proceed to “checkout” in order to purchase the selected items andcomplete the electronic commerce transaction. Once the “checkout”transaction has been completed, the on-line merchant then fulfills thecustomer order, and either ships or delivers the customer order to adelivery location specified by the customer.

It is noted that most electronic commerce transactions that occur overthe Internet are subject to the regulatory laws of the state or regionwhere each on-line sales transaction has occurred. Typically, the lawsand regulations governing on-line sales transactions are determinedbased upon the customer's billing address or the location where thedelivery is to take place.

It is the responsibility of the on-line merchant to be aware of andconform with the requirements of each state's regulations relating toelectronic commerce transactions in that state. Unfortunately, manyon-line merchants are not able to conform with each state's regulationsgoverning on-line sales transactions when engaging in electroniccommerce transactions with customers in a particular state. One reasonfor this is that many systems which are designed to implement electroniccommerce transactions are not configured to take into account each ofthe regulations governing electronic commerce transactions when takingorders from customers residing in different states or regions.

Accordingly, there exists a continual need to improve upon electroniccommerce techniques in order to comply with laws and regulations whichaffect electronic commerce and on-line sales transactions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to specific embodiments of the present invention, a method andcomputer program product are disclosed for implementing electroniccommerce transactions via a data network. A regulated item selected by acustomer is identified. The regulated item may correspond to an itemwhich satisfies predetermined criteria, indicating that the regulateditem is prohibited from being purchased by the customer. Action can thentaken to prohibit the purchase of the selected item, via the datanetwork, by the customer. According to one embodiment, the action takento prohibit the purchase of the regulated item is automaticallyimplemented at a server system configured to implement electroniccommerce transactions between an on-line merchant and the customer.According to a specific implementation, the predetermined criteriacorrespond to regulations which restrict sales of the regulated items topersons in a particular jurisdiction based upon certain criteria suchas, for example, time of day, day of week, age of the customer, type ofproduct being sold, etc.

According to specific embodiments, a variety of techniques may be usedto prevent the purchase of the regulated item by the customer. In oneembodiment, the display of items available for purchase by the customermay be modified to restrict the display of items which are not allowedto be purchased by the customer based upon specific criteria. In anotherembodiment, the customer may be prevented from adding the regulated itemto the customer's electronic shopping cart. Alternatively, the customermay be prevented from purchasing or checking out the regulated itemduring an on-line checkout procedure.

According to one particular embodiment, one embodiment of the presentinvention can relates to a system for implementing electronic commercetransactions via a data network. The system can include at least one CPUand a memory. The system can be configured to at least: provide anonline store for products, at least a portion of the products beingregulated products; receive interactions from a customer with regard tothe online store to create an online order for one or more of theproducts; receive a requested delivery location for the online orderfrom the customer; determine whether the online order includes at leastone regulated product; and determine, when it is determined that theonline order includes at least one regulated product, whether therequested delivery location is permitted based on at least oneregulation associated with the at least one regulated product, the atleast one regulated product pertaining to an alcohol product, and the atleast one regulation serving to restrict sale or delivery of at leastalcohol products.

According to another particular embodiment, one embodiment of thepresent invention can relates to a system for implementing electroniccommerce transactions via a data network. The system can include atleast one CPU and a memory. The system can be configured to at least:provide an online store for products, at least a portion of the productsbeing regulated products; receive a requested delivery location; receiveinteractions from a customer with regard to the online store to createan online order including at least one regulated product, the onlineorder to be provided to the requested delivery location; determinewhether the at least one regulated product within the online order ispermitted based on at least one regulation associated with the at leastone regulated product, the at least one regulated product pertaining toan alcohol product, and the at least one regulation serving to restrictshipment of at least alcohol products; and present to the customer aperceptible indication that at least the at least one regulated productis not permitted when it is determined that the at least one regulatedproduct is not permitted to be shipped to the requested deliverylocation due to the at least one regulation.

Additional objects, features and advantages of the various aspects ofthe present invention will become apparent from the followingdescription of its preferred embodiments, which description should betaken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram showing the most relevant partsof integrated system architecture in accordance with a specificembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process inaccordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3A shows a flow diagram of a Regulated SKU Processing Procedure Ain accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3B is a flow diagram of an Item Restriction Analysis Procedure inaccordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a Regulation Table in accordance with aspecific embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 5 and 6 show alternate embodiments of the Regulated SKU ProcessingProcedure.

FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate various types of rules, conditions, regulations,and/or other information which may be used for implementing theregulated item processing technique in accordance with a specificembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 shows a specific embodiment of a network device suitable forimplementing the regulated item processing techniques of the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

According to specific embodiments of the present invention, a techniqueis described for handling on-line sales of regulated items or productsduring electronic commerce transactions. It will be appreciated that thehandling of on-line sales of regulated items of merchandise provides adifficult challenge since there are literally thousands of federal,state, county, city, and township regulations which may need to becomplied with across thousands of geographic jurisdictions.Additionally, many of these laws and regulations were not originallydrafted to take into account electronic commerce transactions. As aresult, an additional level of difficulty in applying such regulationsto electronic commerce exists in that legal interpretations of such lawsneed to be preformed so as to correctly apply the appropriate laws andregulations to electronic commerce transactions.

Generally, the regulatory laws governing retail commerce transactionsmandate specific restrictions concerning the pricing, display, sale,and/or delivery of regulated products. Many of these laws, however, aresimilar in nature, and therefore may be distilled down to a limitednumber of common conditions which require compliance activity. Accordingto a specific embodiment of the present invention, the conditions andcompliance activities are preferably treated in a systematic manner inorder to allow the generation of a base set of rules which may then bere-applied, perhaps with different parameters, to differentjurisdictions. According one implementation, the base set of rules maybe represented as business rules which may be embodied by a set of listsor tables that enable an electronic commerce system to quickly, easily,and reliably identify regulated items of merchandise, and to easilyrespond to changing laws and/or regulations.

FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate various types of rules, conditions, regulations,and/or other information which may be used for implementing theregulated item processing technique in accordance with a specificembodiment of the present invention. As described in this application,the term “regulated SKU” or “regulated item” may be defined as a SKU(i.e., item of merchandise) which has associated with it special needsfor the display, sale, delivery, pricing and/or vendor selection asmandated by law or other requirements.

According to a specific embodiment of the present invention, selectedSKUs in the on-line catalog may be assigned a corresponding regulationcode attribute which enables that SKU to be identified as belonging to aparticular class of regulated products. In a specific implementation,the assignment of a regulation code attribute may be applied only toregulated SKUs of the on-line catalog. An example of a regulation codeassignment scheme is shown in FIG. 7C of the drawings.

FIG. 7C shows a Regulation Code Attribute Table 770 in accordance with aspecific embodiment of the present invention. The Regulation CodeAttribute Table 770 may be used to help identify regulated SKUs whichbelong to a particular class or sub-class of regulated products.According to one implementation, the regulation code attributes may bestructured so as to allow identification of different levels ofgranularity within a particular regulated product category. For example,as shown in FIG. 7C, the regulation code table 770 includes a regulationcode entry 772 and an associated description 774 of the class orsub-class of the regulated products associated with that particularregulation code. Thus, for example, as shown in FIG. 7C, the regulationcode “A” may be used to identify all SKUs which are related to alcoholtype products. The regulation code “AB” may be used to identify all SKUswhich are associated with beer products. In this example, the regulationcode “AB” for beer products represents a sub-class of regulated alcoholproducts. The regulation code “AB3” may be used to identify SKUs whichare associated with beer having a 3.2% alcohol content, which is asub-class of the regulated beer products. Thus, for example, if aparticular SKU has an associated regulation code attribute of AB3, thisSKU may be interpreted as being an alcohol product, a beer product,and/or a 3.2% beer product. It will be appreciated that any or all ofthese interpretations may be used for applying the appropriateregulatory rules for handling on-line sales of this item.

As shown in FIG. 7C, the Regulation Code Attribute Table 770 may be usedto define a plurality of different classes and sub-classes of regulatedproducts such as, for example, alcohol, beer, 3.2% beer, distilledspirits, wine, dairy, insignia, tobacco, cigarettes, cigars, pipetobacco, non-regulated products, etc. It will be appreciated that theregulated classes and sub-classes of products described in the table ofFIG. 7C does not represent a complete list of all regulated products.Moreover, the regulation code attribute table may be modified to includeadditional classes and sub-classes of other regulated products, whichwill generally be known to one having ordinary skill in the art.

In addition to the regulation code attributes, a list or table ofconditions may also be provided for use in identifying legalrequirements which may mandate that the electronic commerce system evokeone or more types of compliance actions when selling particularregulated products to customers over a data network such as, forexample, the Internet.

FIG. 7A shows an example of a conditions list or Conditions Table 700 inaccordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.According to one implementation, the conditions table may enumeratedifferent types of regulatory conditions which may evoke complianceactions within any of the on-line merchant's service areas.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the Conditions Table 700 includes a plurality ofentries relating to specific condition identifiers or condition IDs.Each entry represents a specific condition or legal requirement whichmay require the on-line merchant to evoke one or more complianceactions. Each entry in the Conditions Table 700 may include, forexample, a Condition ID field 702 and a description field 704.

In the example of FIG. 7A, the Conditions Table 700 may be used todefine a plurality of different regulatory conditions such as, forexample, minimum age conditions, dry delivery address conditions, day ofweek shopping conditions, day of week delivery conditions, hours ofoperation conditions, period of day shopping conditions, period of daydelivery conditions, same state delivery conditions, minimum priceconditions, etc.

For example, the condition “MIN AGE” may be used to represent legalregulations or mandates which exist related to shoppers, customers, ordelivery recipients whose age is less than a specified minimum. TheCondition ID entry corresponding to “DAY OF WEEK SHOPPING” may be usedto refer to regulations or mandates which exist relating to the saleand/or delivery of items which are restricted during certain days of theweek. For example, certain states have mandated that alcohol is not tobe sold to customers on Sunday or Election Day. It will be appreciatedthat the Conditions Table 700 represents a portion of the variousconditions regulating electronic commerce transactions, and that thetable may be modified to include additional conditions which willgenerally be known to one having ordinary skill in the art.

The Conditions Table 700 of FIG. 7A does not specify what actions are tobe implemented in enforcing a particular condition. Thus, according toone implementation, the conditions list may be used as way to categorizeand list each possible type of regulatory condition that may affectelectronic commerce transactions conducted by the on-line merchant.

According to a specific embodiment, selected conditions in theconditions list may evoke one or more compliance actions or restrictionsby the on-line merchant. Further, according to a specificimplementation, at least one list or table may be generated whichincludes various types of compliance actions which may be automaticallyevoked by the on-line merchant's computer system in order to restrictthe sale of specific regulated products.

FIG. 7B shows an example of a regulation list or table 750 in accordancewith a specific embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG.7B, the restrictions table 750 includes a plurality of entries whichspecify various types of compliance actions which may be automaticallyimplemented by the on-line merchant's electronic commerce system toenforce or ensure compliance with specific regulatory conditions.According to one embodiment, the same restriction may be applied to morethan one condition.

As shown in the example of FIG. 7B, each entry in the Restriction Table750 includes a Restriction ID field 752 and a description field 754.Each restriction entry corresponds to a specific compliance action whichmay be used by the on-line merchant to enforce one or more regulatoryconditions. For example, the restriction “no cart” may be used toindicate that a condition will be enforced by not allowing a customer toadd a SKU item to the customer's electronic shopping cart. Therestriction “no checkout” may be used to indicate that a condition maybe enforced by not allowing the customer to purchase the SKU item.

According to a specific implementation, after the various regulationcodes, condition IDs and restriction IDs parameters have been defined,these parameters may then be collated into a regulation list or table inorder to generate a set of rules that may used to manage all or selectedvariations of regulatory compliance affecting electronic commercetransactions conducted by the on-line merchant in various jurisdictions.An example of a regulation table is shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a Regulation Table 400 in accordance with aspecific embodiment of the present invention. As described in greaterdetail below, the regulation table may be used to map various SKUregulation codes, conditions, restrictions, and parameterized values inorder to allow an on-line merchant to implement the appropriateregulatory compliance action(s) when selling or delivering a regulatedSKU product to a customer in specific jurisdictions. Entries in theregulation table may be made that set defaults for all distributioncenters. However, individual distribution centers may be able tooverride the default entries with different or more stringent controlsfor specific delivery zones or sub-zones. According to one embodiment,the regulation table may be consulted to determine whether additionalprocessing may be necessary whenever a regulated SKU is encountered atappropriate points in the customer order processing cycle.

According to a specific implementation, different regulation tables maybe generated for handling sales or delivery of regulated products inspecific regions or zones. Alternatively, a master regulation list maybe generated for handling sales or deliveries or regulated productsthroughout all jurisdictions in which the merchant is engaging inelectronic commerce transactions. Using the master regulation table, asingle set of rules may be used to manage all variations of regulatorycompliance in all jurisdictions of activity. Moreover, for any regulatedSKU which is identified in a particular jurisdiction, the system of thepresent invention may reference the master restriction table in order toidentify the appropriate rules(s) which apply when engaging inelectronic commerce transaction activities relating to the regulatedSKU.

For example, as shown in FIG. 4 of the drawings, the Regulation Table400 includes a plurality of regulation entries (e.g., 401, 403, etc.),wherein each regulation entry includes a specific set of parameterswhich defines specific compliance actions which are to be automaticallyimplemented if certain conditions or other parameters have beensatisfied with respect to a particular class or sub-class of regulatedproduct. The different parameters of the regulation table may include,for example, compliance actions based upon one or more of the followingparameters: distribution center 402, delivery zone 404 or sub-zone 406,regulation code 408, Condition ID 410, Restriction ID 412, age of thecustomer 414, delivery address 416, day of the week 418, time of day420, month of year, week of month, day of month, calendar date,effective data 422, expiration date 424, etc. Thus, for example, entry401 of Regulation Table 400 relates to a compliance action which may beapplied at all distribution centers in which alcohol products (e.g. SKUsassociated with regulation code A) may not be sold (i.e. “No Checkout”)to customers who do not meet the minimum age requirement of being atleast 21 years of age. Entry 403 of the Regulation Table 400 relates toa compliance action which may be applied to all distribution centers inwhich tobacco products (e.g. SKUs associated with regulation code T) maynot be sold (i.e. “No Checkout”) to customers who do not meet theminimum age requirement of being at least 18 years of age.

It will be appreciated that the technique of the present invention mayalso accommodate jurisdictions having more or less stringentrequirements relating to at least a portion of regulated products. Forexample, the city of Atlanta, Ga. prohibits the sale of alcohol onSundays and Election Day, and also prohibits the sale of distilledspirits (e.g., alcohol products containing more than 21% alcohol byvolume) by general merchants or grocery stores. The city of Atlanta alsoallows alcohol to be sold to persons who are at least 18 years of age.In order to comply with these legal requirements, specific entries maybe included in the Regulation Table 400 of FIG. 4.

For example, entry 405 relates to a compliance action which may beimplemented only at Atlanta distribution centers (ATL01), whereinalcohol products may not be sold to customers who are not at least 18years of age. Entries 407 and 409 of the Regulation Table 400 relate tocompliance actions wherein distilled spirits (e.g. SKUs associated withthe regulation code AD) products are not displayed as being for sale toon-line customers whose residence address or delivery address is locatedin Atlanta.

Additionally, one or more entries in the Regulation Table 400 mayinclude an effective date field 422 to allow a particular regulationentry to be entered into the table before the new regulation actuallygoes into effect. Further, selected regulation entries may include anexpiration date field 424 which may be used for specifying a particulardate and/or time when the corresponding legal regulation will no longerbe in effect.

In the example of FIG. 4, two or more conditions and/or restrictions onseparate line entries for the same regulation code may be interpreted ashaving an OR relationship. Two or more conditions and/or restrictions onthe same line entry for a given SKU regulation code may be interpretedas having an AND relationship. For example, entry 401 of RegulationTable 400 relates to a compliance action which may be applied at alldistribution centers in which alcohol products may not be sold tocustomers who do not meet the minimum age requirement of being at least21 years of age, and where the regulation becomes effective on Mar. 15,2000.

It will be appreciated that the Regulation Table 400 of FIG. 4illustrates a specific embodiment for handling on-line sales ofregulated products. However, it will be appreciated that the techniquedescribed herein for handling on-line sales of regulated products indifferent jurisdictions may be implemented using a variety of differentimplementation techniques. For example, according to a differentembodiment, a specific set of rules and/or parameters may be used todefine compliance actions in specific jurisdictions. For example, inorder to prevent Sunday delivery of alcohol products for all deliveryzones in the Atlanta region, the following set of rules and/orparameters may be applied:

-   -   Atlanta delivery zones=ALL    -   Month of Year=ALL    -   Week of Month=ALL    -   Day of Week=Sunday    -   Period of Day=ALL

In order to prevent sale or delivery of alcohol to Atlanta residence onElection Day (i.e., the first Tuesday in November), the following rulesand/or parameters may be defined:

-   -   Atlanta delivery zones=ALL    -   Month of Year=November    -   Week of Month=1    -   Day of Week=Tuesday    -   Period of Day=ALL

FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a specific embodiment of anintegrated system architecture 100 which may be used for implementingthe regulated item processing technique of the present invention. Asshown in FIG. 1, system 100 includes a plurality of subsystems and othercomponents for effecting electronic commerce over a data network. Abrief description of at least a portion of the plurality of subsystemsof system 100 is presented below.

For example, system 100 of FIG. 1 may include a Publishing (PUB)Subsystem 140 which provides an interface to merchants, vendors and/orcontent managers 133; a Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132 which manages theon-line store interface with customers, including customer shopping andordering transactions; an Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 whichmanages pricing data, item availability data, inventory data, vendordata, finance, procurement, etc.; an Order Fulfillment Subsystem (OFS)160 which facilitates the fulfillment of customer orders; etc. Each ofthe various subsystems shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings will now bedescribed briefly below.

According to a specific implementation, the PUB Subsystem 140 may beused for managing SKU inventory and catalog information (e.g. SKUs,UPCs, products, categories, descriptive attributes, etc.). Additionally,according to a specific implementation, the PUB subsystem may be usedfor allowing merchants or vendors to enter regulatory information suchas, for example, regulation code parameters for selected SKUs, conditioninformation, restriction information, etc.

“Inventory” is the stock of SKU items actually available for customerorders. Each different item of inventory is associated with a respectivestock keeping unit or SKU, regardless of whether the item is availablefor customer purchase. A “stock keeping unit” or SKU may be defined as aunique identifier that corresponds to a particular consumer item. A typeof product, for example, Brand A ketchup, may have several unique SKUs,each corresponding, for example, to different sizes and/or flavors ofBrand A ketchup.

Merchants and content managers 133 may enter and maintain SKUinformation stored in the PUB database using the PUB Web GUI interface134 and PUB Bulk Loader interface 136. The SKU information may includeSKU attribute values such as, for example, UPCs, vendors, categories,category hierarchy, images, articles, descriptive information,regulation codes, etc. The PUB Web GUI interface 134 allows merchants toedit SKU information, products, and/or categories. The PUB Bulk Loader136 supports the processing of data files from outside the PUB Subsysteminto the PUB database 141. According to a specific embodiment, the PUBBulk Loader is configured to allow merchants to upload a variety of datafile types into the PUB database including flat data files, and imagefiles. The Bulk Loader processes the flat file information to createappropriate database records for the PUB catalog.

Periodically (e.g., minutes, hours, days) the OMS polls the PUB databasefor new and updated SKU information, and stores the retrieved data intothe OMS database 151. According to a specific embodiment, OMS maintainsavailable-to-promise (ATP), price, and inventory (e.g., replenishmentand purchasing) information for each SKU. OMS may also capture and/ormanage sales and shipment data relating to each SKU. Periodically, OMSpasses new and updated SKU information it acquires from the PUBSubsystem to the OFS. The SKU information may be used by OFS, forexample, to maintain physical inventory and fulfill orders.

According to a specific embodiment, the PUB Subsystem 140 may be used asan interface to allow merchants/vendors to enter regulated merchandiseprocessing instructions relating to specific SKUs. An examples ofregulated merchandise processing instructions for selected regulatedproducts is shown in FIGS. 4 and 7A-C of the drawings.

It will be appreciated that, in an alternate embodiment, the regulatedmerchandise processing instructions may be entered by merchants,vendors, or other human operators via the Webstore interface 132, or viaother desired system interfaces. Further, according to a specificimplementation, the merchant or vendor is able to add, rearrange, andremove items from the list of regulated items.

According to at least one alternate embodiment, regulated merchandiseprocessing instructions may be generated manually or automatically usinga general set of business rules and information relating to laws andregulations governing on-line sales transactions in selected statesand/or regions. A preliminary list of regulated items may also begenerated in the same manner to be approved or edited by merchants. Inany of these embodiments, the regulated merchandise processinginstructions are typically stored in a database for retrieval at anappropriate point of use.

Webstore Subsystem (WS)

According to a specific implementation, the Webstore Subsystem (WS) 132provides an interface for enabling customers to access an on-line store(e.g. Webstore), which, for example, may be used to provide a customerwith an electronic representation of a retail store. In a specificembodiment where the Webstore may be implemented as a website on theWorld Wide Web, customers 102 may access the Webstore via the Internet104 or World Wide Web using any one of a plurality of conventionalbrowsers. The Webstore user interface may be designed to provide a richset of functions without requiring any special browser plug-ins. Thus,according to a specific embodiment, customers may access the Webstoreusing any client machine, regardless of the machine's operating systemplatform. Additionally, for security purposes, the Webstore interfacealso supports data encryption for exchange of any sensitive or privateinformation between the customers and the website. According to aspecific embodiment, the secure Webstore interface may be implementedusing a secure http protocol (HTTPS), commonly known to those ofordinary skill in the art.

In accordance with a specific embodiment, the Webstore Subsystem 132 maybe configured to support a number of customer related features such as,for example, self registration; accessing of customer accountinformation; browsing of product categories and category hierarchy;viewing of product images and product information; keyword searches;delivery scheduling; accessing of customer order history; customizableshopping lists; on-line shopping and ordering; etc.

The Webstore Subsystem (herein referred to as the Webstore) may beimplemented using at least one server which is connected to the datanetwork. According to a specific embodiment, the Webstore may beimplemented using a plurality of web servers (e.g. a load-balanced webserver farm) which helps to minimize server response time and providereal-time failover and redundancy capabilities. Further, according to aspecific embodiment, in order to keep the web server response time to aminimum, the Webstore may be configured such that all processing isperformed on a single server, within one process. Where a plurality ofWebstore servers are used, redundant processing may be performed by atleast a portion of the servers so that a single Webstore server mayhandle all Webstore processing tasks associated with a particularon-line customer. It will be appreciated that the Webstore serverboundaries may be crossed where appropriate, such as, for example, whenaccessing desired databases via the data network.

Order Management Subsystem (OMS)

The Order Management Subsystem (OMS) 150 manages a variety of aspectsrelated to the integrated system architecture of system 100, including,for example, pricing, availability, inventory, vendors, financials,procurement, and data flows between various subsystems.

As shown in FIG. 1, the OMS subsystem 150 includes at least one database151 for storing various data received from at least a portion of theother subsystems. According to a specific embodiment, the database 151is configured to include a plurality of schemas, such as, for example,standard packaged application schemas and/or customized schemas.According to a specific implementation, the OMS database is configuredas a single Oracle database running on a Sun Solaris server.

According to a specific implementation, OMS batch processing may becontrolled using a process scheduler. The process scheduler is able tomanage the number of concurrent processes being run and the date/time atwhich certain processes are to run or be executed. The process schedulermay also enable central visibility of all processes currently running.Batch processing and reporting may be accomplished using a variety ofdifferent technologies commonly known to one having ordinary skill inthe art.

The Order Management Subsystem may be configured to support bothasynchronous and synchronous interfaces with the other subsystems. In aspecific embodiment, the OMS is configured to support an asynchronousinterface with each of the other subsystems. Additionally, each OMSinterface is configurable, and may be configured to support the runningof batch processes as often as is desirable.

Implementation of the various interfaces between OMS and the othersubsystems may be accomplished using a variety of different techniquescommonly known to one having ordinary skill in the art. The followingdescription provides an example of at least some of the varioustechniques which may be used for interfacing OMS with the othersubsystems. However, it will be appreciated that the specific interfacesdescribed below may be implemented using other techniques commonly knownto those of ordinary skill in the art.

The interface between the OMS and the Webstore Subsystem may beimplemented, for example, using a plurality of executable programs. Afirst portion of the executable programs may be responsible for movingdata from the Webstore to the OMS. This data may include, for example,new/updated customer data, new/updated order data, order cutoffinformation, order billing information, customer return information,customer credits and fees (e.g. bill adjustment data), etc. A secondportion of the executable programs is responsible for moving data fromthe OMS to the Webstore Subsystem. This data may include, for example,inventory data, availability data, pricing data, and information aboutshipped customer orders.

Order Fulfillment Subsystem (OFS)

The Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 manages all functionality of thedistribution center (DC). In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the OFS includesappropriate hardware and/or software for managing the DC, including, forexample, a warehouse management system (e.g. application software), atleast one database 161, an optional automated material handling (AMH)controller component 163, if desired (which manages conveyor, carousel,and scanner components), etc.

In a specific implementation, the Order Fulfillment Subsystem 160 may beimplemented using a warehouse management system such as, for example,the MOVE warehouse management system provided by Optum, Inc. of CostaMesa, Calif. The warehouse system also provides an interface with theOrder Management Subsystem. In a specific embodiment, this interface maybe implemented using a business host interface (BHI). The warehousemanagement subsystem may also provide the interface for allowing the OMSsubsystem to communicate with the OFS database 161.

The description is only a partial description of an architecture that issuitable for practicing the current invention, with emphasis on thesubsystems that are most directly involved in the Regulated SKUProcessing Procedure of the present invention. For a more completedescription of such an architecture, see U.S. patent application Ser.No. 09/568,603.

It will be appreciated that other embodiments of the system of FIG. 1may be used for implementing the technique of the present invention. Forexample, entire subsystems or selected features or components of the WSSubsystem 132, OMS Subsystem 150, PUB Subsystem 140, and/or OFSSubsystem 160 may be eliminated (if desired) or incorporated into othersubsystems of the system of FIG. 1. Such modifications will be apparentto one having ordinary skill in the art. In a specific embodiment, it ispreferable that the system 100 include at least a Webstore Subsystem(for receiving customer orders and maintaining inventory records), andan Order Fulfillment Subsystem (for fulfilling customer orders).

FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a Customer Order Handling Process 200 inaccordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention. TheCustomer Order Handling Process of FIG. 2 depicts a simplified overviewof the various processes by which customer orders are taken, thecustomer orders are processed, and the customer orders are fulfilled anddelivered in accordance with a specific embodiment of the presentinvention.

At 202, a customer enters his or her customer order via the Webstore 132interface (described above). According to a specific embodiment, a“customer order” includes a list of SKU items that have been ordered,their associated quantities, and other relevant information (e.g.,payment information, delivery time information, etc.)

The customer order may include one or more “line item orders,” whereeach line item order corresponds to a particular SKU and includes adesired quantity of the ordered SKU.

According to a specific embodiment, during the customer orderingprocess, customers will be provided information relating to availabilityof items. For example, customers may be provided with informationrelating to particular items which will not be available for delivery atthe delivery window selected by the customer.

Returning to FIG. 2, at a designated time after a customer order hasbeen placed, a “cutoff” time occurs (204), at which point the customeris no longer able to modify the order. The customer order is then sentalong with other “cutoff” customer orders to be processed (206). Theprocessing of a customer order is generally described in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 09/568,603, previously incorporated herein byreference. In one implementation, order processing may be implemented atthe Webstore Subsystem 132. In alternate embodiments, the orderprocessing may be implemented at any desired subsystem which has beenconfigured to handle the various tasks associated with the processing ofcustomer orders. After the customer order has been processed, thecustomer order is then fulfilled (208) by obtaining the appropriateitems from a warehouse, distribution center, or other locations. Oncethe order has been fulfilled, it may then be delivered (210) to thecustomer.

According to different embodiments of the present invention, there are avariety of techniques which may be used to help prevent the sale ofrestricted products to on-line customers which would violate legalregulations in various jurisdictions. For example, one technique forpreventing illegal sales of restricted products is to prevent therestricted products from being displayed to the customers during theon-line customer shopping session. Another technique is to not allow theregulated item to be added to the customer's electronic shopping cart. Afurther example is to not permit the regulated item to be checked out ofthe customer's electronic shopping cart. Yet another example is toprevent delivery of the regulated item to the customer. Several of theseexamples are described in greater detail below with respect to FIGS. 3A,3B, 5, and 6 of the drawings.

FIG. 3A shows a flow diagram of a Regulated SKU Processing Procedure A(300) in accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention.According to one implementation, the Regulated SKU Processing Procedure300 may be implemented during an on-line customer shopping session.Additionally, according to a specific implementation, the Regulated SKUProcessing Procedure 300 may be implemented at the web store 130 of FIG.1.

Initially, as shown at 302 of FIG. 3A, a customer may access the on-linemerchant's electronic commerce system in order to initiate a shoppingsession. According to a specific implementation, as shown in FIG. 1, forexample, the customer may access the Webstore 130 for initiating anon-line shopping session.

Once the customer has initiated a shopping session with the on-linemerchant's electronic commerce system, the customer may begin to shop bybrowsing the on-line merchant's catalog and adding items to thecustomer's electronic shopping cart. According to a specificimplementation, the customer may schedule (304) a specific deliverywindow (e.g. specifying a particular date and time) for receivingdelivery of the customer order. For example, the on-line merchantWebvan.com requires that customers select a delivery window for eachcustomer order that is placed with the on-line system. Once the customerorder has been fulfilled, it will subsequently be delivered to thecustomer at the time and date specified by the selected delivery window.At the time of delivery, the customer may be asked to provide asignature for proof of receipt of the customer order. According to somejurisdictions, the sale of a product is considered to occur at the timethat the product is actually delivered to the customer. Accordingly, itwill be appreciated that, according to specific embodiments, thedelivery window may determine whether the sale of a particularrestricted product is permitted.

According to a specific embodiment, each customer delivery address maybe geocoded or mapped to a respective area, zone, and/or subzone, which,according to a specific implementation, are not based upon the zip codeof the delivery address. This mapping technique is advantageous sincemunicipal regulations frequently define regulated regions of commerce byarea, zone, or subzone (e.g. “dry zones” where the sale of alcohol isprohibited). Moreover, such regulated regions may bisect one or more zipcode regions. Accordingly, using the customer delivery address geocodingtechnique of the present invention, delivery zones or subzones may bedefined which map directly to a municipally regulated zone or subzones.Thus, for example, if a municipally regulated “dry zone” is mandatedwhich bisects one or more zip code regions, a delivery zone may bedefined to correspond to the mandated dry zone boundaries, regardless ofzip code boundaries. Regulated product(s) may then be prevented frombeing sold or delivered to customers whose delivery address is withinthis “dry” delivery zone.

According to a specific embodiment, after the customer selects orschedules a delivery window for delivery of the customer order, thecustomer's electronic shopping cart may be examined to determine (306)whether the customer's electronic shopping cart includes any items.According to a specific embodiment, if it is determined that thecustomer cart is not empty, an Item Restriction Analysis Procedure maybe executed (308) in order to remove any regulated items selected by thecustomer which are not available to be delivered at the specifieddelivery window. An example of an Item Restriction Analysis Procedure isshown in FIG. 3B of the drawings.

During the Item Restriction Analysis Procedure, a first item from thecustomer's scheduled shopping cart is selected (352). The selected itemis then analyzed (354) in order to determine whether the selected itemcorresponds to a regulated item which is not allowed to be delivered atthe designated delivery window. In performing this determination, aregulation code associated with the selected item or SKU may beidentified. A regulation table (e.g. Regulation Table 400) may then beconsulted to determine whether the sale or delivery of the identified,regulated SKU is permissible. If it is determined that the selected itemis not allowed to be sold or delivered to the customer at the designateddelivery window, a selected item may be removed (356) from thecustomer's scheduled shopping cart and placed into an unscheduledshopping cart. If, however, it is determined that the selected item isallowed to be sold and delivered to the customer at the designateddelivery window, no further action is taken regarding the selected item.Once the Item Restriction Analysis Procedure has been performed for theselected item, a determination may then be made (358) as to whetherthere are additional items in the customer's scheduled shopping cart. Ifso, a next item from the scheduled shopping cart is selected foranalysis. This process may continue until each of the items in thecustomer's scheduled shopping cart have been analyzed by the ItemRestriction Analysis Procedure.

Returning to FIG. 3A, once the Item Restriction Analysis Procedure hasperformed an analysis on the items in the customer's scheduled shoppingcart, a determination may then be made (310) as to whether thecustomer's scheduled shopping cart is empty. If so, the customer may beadvised (312) that no items are available to be delivered at theselected delivery window. According to a specific implementation, thecustomer may then be provided with the opportunity to select analternate delivery window.

According to an alternate embodiment, the customer may not be requiredto select a delivery window. For example, many on-line merchants suchas, for example, Amazon.com, do not require the customer to select adelivery window for receipt of the customer order. Rather, the on-linemerchant allows the customer to purchase products via the Internet. Thepurchased items are then packaged and shipped to the customer via commoncarrier. Typically, the customer is charged for the purchase of thegoods at the time that the order is shipped to the customer.

One technique for handling on-line sales of regulated products is todynamically modify the display of products which are available to besold/delivered to each customer. This is shown, for example, at events314 and 316 of FIG. 3A.

During the customer's on-line shopping session, the customer may request(314) display of selected items available for purchase by the on-linemerchant. According to a specific implementation, the display of itemsavailable for purchase by the customer may be modified (316) based uponpredetermined rules such as, for example, the regulation criteriadefined in one or more regulation lists. The modification of the productdisplay may be based upon a number of different factors such as, forexample, the customer's delivery address, the customer's age, thecustomer's residence address, the date/time of delivery (if any), etc.According to one embodiment, the products which are not allowed to besold or delivered to a specific customer may be hidden or otherwiseprevented from being displayed to that customer. Alternatively, theregulated items may be displayed to the customer, but the customer willnot be allowed to add the regulated item to the customer's electronicshopping cart.

Another technique for handling on-line sales of regulated items is toscreen for regulated items as the customer selects each item to add tohis or her electronic shopping cart. This is generally shown by events,for example, 318-326 of FIG. 3A.

Initially, the customer may select a particular item, and submit arequest to add (318) the selected item to the customer's shopping cart.An analysis may then be conducted (320) in order to determine whetherthe selected item is allowed to be sold and delivered to the customer(at a specified delivery window, if any). In performing thisdetermination, a regulation code associated with the selected item orSKU may be identified. A regulation table (e.g. Regulation Table 400)may then be consulted to determine whether the sale or delivery of theidentified, regulated SKU is permissible.

If it is determined that the selected item is not allowed to be sold anddelivered to the customer, the customer may be advised (322) that theselected item is not available to be added to the customer's electronicshopping cart. Additionally, according to a specific implementation, theregulated item may be placed (324) into an unscheduled shopping cart forthe customer. If, on the other hand, it is determined that the selecteditem is allowed to be sold and delivered to the customer, the selecteditem may then be added to the customer's electronic shopping cart.Thereafter, the customer may continue with his or her on-line shoppingsession or may request to proceed to checkout.

According to a specific embodiment, another approach for handlingon-line sales of regulated products is to screen the customer'selectronic shopping cart for regulated items during checkout. Thistechnique is generally described, for example, by events 326-332 of FIG.3A.

Referring to FIG. 3A, at some point during the on-line shopping session,the customer may request to proceed to checkout in order to purchase thegoods in the customer's electronic shopping cart. If, according to oneembodiment, precautions have already been implemented for preventinginappropriate regulated items from being placed into the customer'sscheduled shopping cart, then the checkout operation may proceednormally, whereby items in the customer's scheduled shopping cart may becheck out (328) for purchase by the customer. If, according to aspecific embodiment, selected regulated items have previously beenplaced into an unscheduled shopping cart for the customer, adetermination may then be made (330) as to whether any items exist inthe customer's unscheduled shopping cart. If so, the customer may beadvised (332) of the existence of the unscheduled shopping cart.Thereafter, the customer may then choose to continue shopping using thecustomer's unscheduled shopping cart.

Alternate embodiments of the Regulated SKU Processing Procedure areshown in FIGS. 5 and 6 of the drawings. In each of these embodiments,on-line sales of regulated SKU items may be handled during the customercheckout operation, where upon the content of the customer's shoppingcart may be screened for regulated items which are not allowed to besold/delivered to the customer.

As shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5, once the customer has requested(502) checkout, an Item Restriction Analysis Procedure may be executed(504) for analyzing the contents of the customer's shopping cart. Anexample of an Item Restriction Analysis Procedure is shown in FIG. 3B,described previously. In the example of FIG. 3B, the Item RestrictionAnalysis Procedure will remove regulated items from the customer'scurrent shopping cart which are not allowed to be sold or delivered tothe customer, and may place the removed items into a new shopping cart.At 506 a determination is made as to whether there are any remainingitems to be checked out of the customer's current shopping cart afterhaving executed the Item Restriction Analysis Procedure. If so, flow maythen commence starting at point B of FIG. 3A. If, however, it isdetermined that there are no current items to be checked out from thecustomer's shopping cart, the customer may be advised (508) that thereare no items available to be delivered or sold to the customer. Thecustomer may also be advised as to the reason why the regulated itemsare unavailable. Thereafter, flow may then continue at point A of FIG.3A.

As shown in the embodiment of FIG. 6, once the customer has requested(552) checkout, a determination is then made (554) as to whether thereare any regulated items identified in the customer's shopping cart whichare not allowed to be sold or delivered to the customer, based uponpredetermined criteria such as that shown, for example, in FIG. 4. Ifso, the customer may be requested (556) to remove the identifiedregulated items from the customer's electronic shopping cart. After allof the identified regulated items have been removed from the customer'selectronic shopping cart, flow may then continue at point B of FIG. 3A.

Another technique for preventing illegal sales of restricted products isto prevent delivery of the regulated item to the customer. According toa specific embodiment, delivery couriers (110, FIG. 1) may be notifiedthat a particular shipment contains one or more regulated items. Adelivery courier may then be required to verify specific information(e.g. proof of age of the customer) before delivering the regulateditem(s) to the customer. According to a specific implementation, thedelivery restrictions may be provided to the delivery courier via theuse of a mobile field device (MFD) 106. A mobile field device (MFD) maybe configured to download and/or upload various types of information,including, for example, customer order history information, deliveryinformation (e.g. vehicle delivery routes, stops, etc.), customerreturns information, credits, adjustments, regulated deliveryinformation, etc.

Other Embodiments

Generally, the regulated item processing techniques of the presentinvention may be implemented on software and/or hardware. For example,they can be implemented in a separate user process, in a library packagebound into network applications, on a specially constructed machine,etc. In a specific embodiment of this invention, the technique of thepresent invention is implemented in software such as an applicationrunning on an operating system.

A software or software/hardware hybrid implementation of the regulateditem processing technique of this invention may be implemented on ageneral-purpose programmable machine selectively activated orreconfigured by a computer program stored in memory. Such programmablemachine may be a network device designed to handle network traffic, suchas, for example, a router or a switch. Such network devices may havemultiple network interfaces including frame relay and ISDN interfaces,for example. Specific examples of such network devices include routersand switches. A general architecture for some of these machines willappear from the description given below. In an alternative embodiment,the regulated item processing technique of this invention may beimplemented on a general-purpose network host machine such as a personalcomputer or workstation. Further, the invention may be at leastpartially implemented on a card (e.g., an interface card) for a networkdevice or a general-purpose computing device.

Referring now to FIG. 8, a network device 60 suitable for implementingthe regulated item processing techniques of the present inventionincludes a master central processing unit (CPU) 62, interfaces 68, and abus 67 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriatesoftware or firmware, the CPU 62 may be responsible for implementingspecific functions associated with the functions of a desired networkdevice. For example, when configured to perform the functions of aserver system adapted to implement electronic commerce transactions, theCPU 62 may be responsible for analyzing packets, encapsulating packets,forwarding packets to appropriate network devices, identifying regulateditems or SKUs, identifying legal requirements or conditions whichrequire compliance action to be taken with regard to the sale ofregulated products, determining appropriate compliance actions to beimplemented for identified regulated items, etc. The CPU 62 preferablyaccomplishes all these functions under the control of software includingan operating system (e.g. Windows NT), and any appropriate applicationssoftware.

CPU 62 may include one or more processors 63 such as a processor fromthe Motorola family of microprocessors or the MIPS family ofmicroprocessors. In an alternative embodiment, processor 63 is speciallydesigned hardware for controlling the operations of network device 60.In a specific embodiment, a memory 61 (such as non-volatile RAM and/orROM) also forms part of CPU 62. However, there are many different waysin which memory could be coupled to the system. Memory block 61 may beused for a variety of purposes such as, for example, caching and/orstoring data, programming instructions, etc.

The interfaces 68 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimesreferred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending andreceiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support otherperipherals used with the network device 60. Among the interfaces thatmay be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cableinterfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. Inaddition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such asfast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces,HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like.Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate forcommunication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may alsoinclude an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM.The independent processors may control such communications intensivetasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providingseparate processors for the communications intensive tasks, theseinterfaces allow the master microprocessor 62 to efficiently performrouting computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.

Although the system shown in FIG. 8 illustrates one specific networkdevice of the present invention, it is by no means the only networkdevice architecture on which the present invention can be implemented.For example, an architecture having a single processor that handlescommunications as well as routing computations, etc. is often used.Further, other types of interfaces and media could also be used with thenetwork device.

Regardless of network device's configuration, it may employ one or morememories or memory modules (such as, for example, memory block 65)configured to store data, program instructions for the general-purposenetwork operations and/or other information relating to thefunctionality of the regulated item processing techniques describedherein. The program instructions may control the operation of anoperating system and/or one or more applications, for example. Thememory or memories may also be configured to include data structureswhich store regulation code information, Condition ID information,Restriction ID information, regulation information, etc.

Because such information and program instructions may be employed toimplement the systems/methods described herein, the present inventionrelates to machine readable media that include program instructions,state information, etc. for performing various operations describedherein. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limitedto, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape;optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media such asfloptical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured tostore and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices(ROM) and random access memory (RAM). Examples of program instructionsinclude both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and filescontaining higher level code that may be executed by the computer usingan interpreter.

Although several preferred embodiments of this invention have beendescribed in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings,it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to theseprecise embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may beeffected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from thescope of spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for implementing electronic commercetransactions via a data network, said system comprising: at least oneCPU; and a memory; and said system being configured to: provide anonline store for products that can be purchased online, at least aportion of the products being regulated products; receive interactionsfrom a customer with regard to the online store to create an onlineorder for one or more of the products; receive a requested deliverylocation for the online order from the customer, the requested deliverylocation includes a state; determine whether the online order includesat least one regulated product; and determine, when it is determinedthat the online order includes at least one regulated product, whetherthe requested delivery location is permitted based on at least oneregulation associated with the at least one regulated product, the atleast one regulated product pertaining to an alcohol product, and the atleast one regulation serving to restrict sale or delivery of at leastalcohol products, wherein the at least one regulation used to determinewhether the requested delivery location is permitted depends on at leastthe state of the requested delivery location, wherein said system isconfigured to inform the customer that delivery of the online order, dueto the at least one regulated product, is subject to at least onerestriction, and wherein when it is determined that the at least oneregulation prohibits delivery of the at least one regulated product atthe requested delivery location, said system is configured to (i) allowremoval of the at least one regulated product from the online order andcontinue with the requested delivery location, and (ii) allow thecustomer to designate another delivery location.
 2. A system of claim 1,wherein the requested delivery location includes a county within thestate, and wherein the at least one regulation used to determine whetherthe requested delivery location is permitted depends on the state, andthe county within the state, for the requested delivery location.
 3. Asystem of claim 1, wherein said system is further configured to: presentto the customer a perceptible indication that at least the at least oneregulated product is not permitted to be delivered at the requesteddelivery location when it is determined that the at least one regulatedproduct is not permitted to be delivered at the requested deliverylocation.
 4. A system of claim 1, wherein the at least one regulation atleast restricts the sale of the regulated product on at least one day ofthe week.
 5. A system as recited in claim 1, wherein the requesteddelivery location includes a city.
 6. A system as recited in claim 1,wherein the at least one regulated product is wine.
 7. A system asrecited in claim 1, wherein the at least one regulation at leastrestricts sales of the regulated product to persons under apredetermined age.
 8. A system as recited in claim 1, wherein the atleast one regulation is acquired from a data store associated with aserver system, and wherein the data store stores a plurality ofregulations, each of the regulations being associated with a differentlocation.
 9. A system for implementing electronic commerce transactionsvia a data network, said system comprising: at least one CPU; and amemory; and said system being configured to: provide an online store forproducts that can be purchased online, at least a portion of theproducts being regulated products; receive interactions from a customerwith regard to the online store to create an online order for one ormore of the products; receive a requested delivery location for theonline order from the customer, the requested delivery location includesa state; determine whether the online order includes at least oneregulated product; and determine, when it is determined that the onlineorder includes at least one regulated product, whether the requesteddelivery location is permitted based on at least one regulationassociated with the at least one regulated product, the at least oneregulated product pertaining to an alcohol product, and the at least oneregulation serving to restrict sale or delivery of at least alcoholproducts, wherein the at least one regulation used to determine whetherthe requested delivery location is permitted depends on at least thestate of the requested delivery location, and wherein when the at leastone regulation prohibits delivery of the at least one regulated productat the requested delivery location, said system is configured to (i)allow removal of the at least one regulated product from the onlineorder and continue with the requested delivery location, and (ii) allowthe customer to designate another delivery location.
 10. A system ofclaim 9, wherein the requested delivery location includes a countywithin the state, and wherein the at least one regulation used todetermine whether the requested delivery location is permitted dependson at least the state and the county for the requested deliverylocation.
 11. A system as recited in claim 10, wherein the at least oneregulation is acquired from the memory, and wherein the memory stores aplurality of regulations for a plurality of different locations.
 12. Asystem as recited in claim 11, wherein the at least one regulatedproduct is wine.
 13. A system of claim 11, wherein the at least oneregulation at least restricts the sale of the regulated product on atleast one day of the week.
 14. A system of claim 11, wherein said systemis further configured to: present to the customer a perceptibleindication that at least the at least one regulated product is notpermitted to be delivered at the requested delivery location when it isdetermined that the at least one regulated product is not permitted tobe delivered at the requested delivery location.
 15. A system forimplementing electronic commerce transactions via a data network, saidsystem comprising: at least one CPU; and a memory; and said system beingconfigured to: provide an online store for products, at least a portionof the products being regulated products; receive interactions from acustomer with regard to the online store to create an online order forone or more of the products; receive a requested delivery location forthe online order from the customer, the requested delivery locationincludes a state; determine whether the online order includes at leastone regulated product; and determine, when it is determined that theonline order includes at least one regulated product, whether therequested delivery location is permitted based on at least oneregulation associated with the at least one regulated product, the atleast one regulated product pertaining to an alcohol product, and the atleast one regulation serving to restrict sale or delivery of at leastalcohol products, wherein the at least one regulation used to determinewhether the requested delivery location is permitted depends on at leastthe state of the requested delivery location, and wherein said systembeing further configured to: receive delivery information other than therequested delivery location, the delivery information including at leasta day of week, wherein the at least one regulation at least restrictsthe sale of the regulated product on at least one day of the week.
 16. Asystem as recited in claim 10, wherein the at least one regulationrequires an appropriate recipient to be present to receive the deliveryof the regulated product.
 17. A system for implementing electroniccommerce transactions via a data network, said system comprising: atleast one CPU; and a memory; and said system being configured to:provide an online store for products that can be purchased online, atleast a portion of the products being regulated products; receive arequested delivery location; receive interactions from a customer withregard to the online store for creating an online order including atleast one regulated product, the online order to be provided to therequested delivery location; determine whether the at least oneregulated product within the online order is permitted based on at leastone regulation associated with the at least one regulated product, theat least one regulated product pertaining to an alcohol product, and theat least one regulation serving to restrict shipment of at least alcoholproducts; and present to the customer a perceptible indication that atleast the at least one regulated product is not permitted when it isdetermined that the at least one regulated product is not permitted tobe shipped to the requested delivery location due to the at least oneregulation, wherein the requested delivery location includes a state,and wherein the at least one regulation used to determine whether therequested delivery location is permitted depends on the state for therequested delivery location, wherein said system is configured to informthe customer that delivery of the online order, due to the at least oneregulated product, is subject to at least one restriction, and whereinwhen it is determined that the at least one regulation prohibitsdelivery of the at least one regulated product at the requested deliverylocation, said system is configured to (i) allow removal of the at leastone regulated product from the online order and continue with therequested delivery location, and (ii) allow the customer to designateanother delivery location.
 18. A system as recited in claim 17, whereinthe determination of whether the at least one regulated product ispermitted comprises determining whether the requested delivery locationfor the online order is permitted.
 19. A system as recited in claim 17,wherein the determination of whether the at least one regulated productis permitted comprises determining whether shipment of the online orderto the requested delivery location is permitted based on the at leastone regulation associated with the at least one regulated product.
 20. Asystem of claim 17, wherein the requested delivery location includes acounty within the state, and wherein the at least one regulation used todetermine whether the requested delivery location is permitted dependson the state and the county for the requested delivery location.
 21. Asystem as recited in claim 17, wherein the at least one regulatedproduct is wine.
 22. A system as recited in claim 17, wherein the atleast one regulation is acquired from the memory, and wherein the memorystores a plurality of regulations for a plurality of differentlocations.